Login | Alerts | RSS | Contact Us | Submit News & Photos

HomeGo Friday FootballAbbeville High School

Abbeville looks for same result in Woodruff rematch

STORY TOOLS

Abbeville used to get playoff rematches routinely with Batesburg-Leesville, but this week, the Panthers play host to Woodruff in a rematch of their 21-19 win on Sept. 12.

In that game, Abbeville used two fake punts, including one for a touchdown, to overcome a late interception. Woodruff picked off a pass with three minutes to go, and returned it 48 yards for a score, but the two-point conversion attempt failed.

Still, Abbeville coach Jamie Nickles said he doesn’t have any more confidence this week because of the Week 3 win.

“I have confidence it’s going to be one whale of a game,” Nickles said. “Just from looking at two football teams who are evenly matched. We just got whipped last time. It wasn’t us playing that bad, they’re just that good.”

Woodruff outgained Abbeville 384-312 as Wolverines’ quarterback Jake Lambert was 22-of-43 passing for 271 yards and a touchdown. Running back Maurice Gilliam had 17 rushes for 108 yards and a touchdown. Gilliam has rushed for 948 yards, while Lambert has passed for 2,726 yards and 30 touchdowns.

Woodruff (10-2) hasn’t lost since the Abbeville game, winning nine straight, including playoff wins over Batesburg-Leesville and Crescent. The teams have common opponents in Chesnee and Crescent, with both sides beating those teams by at least 10 points.

One theory to decide the game could for Abbeville to use a more physical style since Woodruff employs a finesse spread offense, less smash-mouth than the Panthers’ A-bone attack.

“They’re just so good of athletes, it’s hard to do that,” Nickles said. “But that’ll be a challenge for our kids, can we do that.”

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.

Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.

Click here for our user-contributions policy.

Comments

IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.

Before you post, consider this:

  1. Keep it clean. Comments containing obscene, profane, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented language -- including creative spelling and typographical representations of foul language -- will be removed.
  2. Be truthful. Don't lie or spread rumors about anyone or anything. Stick to discussing what is factually known.
  3. Be nice. Don't threaten anyone, and do not post any comments that involve racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person. Hateful or offensive comments will not be tolerated.
  4. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button to alert us to objectionable comments. Do not respond to trolls or those who seek to harass another poster.
  5. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  6. Help us get it right. If you have information to add to the story or you find a factual error or misspelling send us an email or call the newsroom at 864-260-1274.

Please read our official user-contributions policy.



Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

  Want the editors to know how you feel? Click here to say it privately.

Please download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player, or enable JavaScript for your browser to view the video player.