Login | Site Map | Archives | Electronic Edition | Mobile Edition | Alerts | RSS | Contact Us | Submit News & Photos | Subscriber Services

Home2008 ElectionsS.C. Congressional Elections

Democratic hopeful stops in Anderson to turn supporters of Republican Congressman

Jane Dyer

Jane Dyer

STORY TOOLS

— A pelting rain might have dampened attendance, but not the passion brought Wednesday to an Easley woman's Congressional campaign stop at an Anderson restaurant.

Jane Dyer, Democrat hopeful for the District 3 Congressional seat held by Republican Gresham Barrett, talked politics as she sat at a table at the Old Country Smokehouse on North Main Street, eating barbecue and sharing birthday cake with a restaurant employee.

“Number one, we are in a financial meltdown,” Dyer said during a spirited discussion about her hopes for the future. “The hands-off attitude of President (George W.) Bush and Rep. Barrett got us there.”

After talking for about two hours to any listener, Dyer was off to her next stop, one of 30 towns in a month.

Jim Roach, manager of the restaurant, saying it “is always wonderful” when candidates drop in to the business, attributed the small crowd Wednesday to a lack of advertising of the event.

Reached by telephone in Washington, D.C., Collene Mangone, communications director for Barrett, said she is “not sure responsibility falls at the foot of any individual,” cited Barrett's attempts to improve regulation of sub-prime lending, attempts to regulate mortgage lenders Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and two attempts at introducing legislation to require federal agencies to review outdated regulations.

If elected to Congress, Dyer would advocate alternative energy, a balanced budget, letting Iraq pay its way to allow troop withdrawal, affordable and accessible health care, revision of the federal No Child Left Behind Act education law and fair pay for women, she said. She said her Air Force pilot training and commercial service as a captain of a FedEx jet taught her to maintain order and play by the rules.

“I will advocate Congressional oversight, policies that work and reasonable regulations (of mortgage lenders, insurance companies and banks),” she said.

“I am not a maverick,” said Dyer, talking a jab at the Republican presidential campaign of Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin. “I am a stand for the right kind of thing person.”

Mangone questioned Dyer's “accurate representation of (Barrett's) record.”

Saying the country could face up to a year to recover from recent action that has authorized $700 billion to stabilize the economy, Dyer said she would use her experience as a military and commercial pilot, her belief in America's ingenuity and teamwork to lead the nation to turn the corner if elected to office.

According to Barrett's Web site, he issued a public statement on Sept. 29 regarding an initial version of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.

"The long-term success of the American economy has always been based on a free market system that rewards innovation, entrepreneurship and private participation," Barrett said. "I voted no on the legislation brought to the floor of the House of Representatives today because it would have begun the federalization of the private markets and forever changed the face of (America’s) free market system, leading to broad and lasting negative consequences for the American taxpayer, businessman and consumer.” It is critical that our government take steps to support our economic framework through these difficult times and I am committed to continue working with my colleagues on solutions that get us through this difficult time while preserving the free market principles that must continue to guide our economy."

The House defeated the measure.

About a week later, the Senate passed another measure to pump $700 billion into the economy, Rep. Barrett voted to support it, and the bill passed the House. President Bush signed the act into law.

According to Barrett's statement on Oct. 3, he cited an “economic Pearl Harbor,” including failure to meet payrolls in the Upstate.

“... Whether it is a small business that may have to close its doors, or major corporations employing thousands of my constituents, jobs are at risk,” said the Congressman in a prepared statement. “If Congress does not act, the effects will be serious for American small business, families and consumers.”

Wednesday, Dyer said Upstate voters aren't buying into the message.

“People are fed up,” said Dyer, who is working to heat up the rhetoric in a 30-city campaign that began Oct. 1. “People are concerned, worried and angry about the position we are in.”

Comments

There are 5 responses to this article.

Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.

Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.

Click here for our user-contributions policy.

Comments

IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.

Before you post, consider this:

  1. Keep it clean. Comments containing obscene, profane, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented language -- including creative spelling and typographical representations of foul language -- will be removed.
  2. Be truthful. Don't lie or spread rumors about anyone or anything. Stick to discussing what is factually known.
  3. Be nice. Don't threaten anyone, and do not post any comments that involve racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person. Hateful or offensive comments will not be tolerated.
  4. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button to alert us to objectionable comments. Do not respond to trolls or those who seek to harass another poster.
  5. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  6. Help us get it right. If you have information to add to the story or you find a factual error or misspelling send us an email or call the newsroom at 864-260-1274.

Please read our official user-contributions policy.

Re: "The hands-off attitude of President Bush and Rep Barrett got us there."
Didn't the Democratic controlled Congress "get us there" with their refusal to pass regulations on out of control lending????


I didn't know Gresham had opposition. Who is this person? If I go eat lunch at the smokehouse, can I run for congress?


in response to TrueAndersonian

The Democrats have been "in control" for less than 18 months and the President and all cabinet officials are still Republicans.
It was the deregulation policies and appointees of Reagan and the two Bushes and the Republican Congresses for most of the past 20 years that got us in this mess.
What has Barrett really done, other than vote the Bush program, since he got to Washington? His predecesors, including Graham, did a lot. Oh yeah, he was against the bailout before he was for the bailout. Of course, he was for it once they added all the expensive earmarks, pork and so forth.


The democrats are every bit as guilty of causing this mess as are the Republicans and you know it. Both parties, not just the Republicans are also guilty of spending our tax dollars like a drunk sailor on Saturday night on those pork projects. I think the whole lot of them need to be fired and replaced with some folks that have common sense.


I'm sure she is going to change the whole world, same as obama and the rest of the lying S *$@^&.




Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

  Want the editors to know how you feel? Click here to say it privately.

Please download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player, or enable JavaScript for your browser to view the video player.