Login | Site Map | Archives | Electronic Edition | Mobile Edition | Alerts | RSS | Contact Us | Submit News & Photos | Subscriber Services

Home2008 ElectionsOpinions

Fully funding Medicaid is a necessity

STORY TOOLS

At first glance, the cigarette tax may seem far removed from public education. I have been a public educator for 23 years and I see the children of the poor and the working poor struggle with limited access or more often, no access to health care. These are the children that struggle in school and become dropouts.

Medicaid is the state-funded healthcare for our poor citizens. With the lack of funding currently in Medicaid, the poor are put on waiting lists to get a physician. Fully funding Medicaid through the cigarette tax would mean we get federal matching funds of $3 to every $1. With that level of funding, we could provide the necessary health care for the poor in South Carolina.

The new funding could establish a safety net of insurance for the working poor. Working people unable to afford health insurance or without access to health insurance are the largest growing segment in our state. There are currently about 800,000 people who are uninsured or underinsured in South Carolina. The state needs to set up an insurance pool that the working poor could buy into and get a basic level of health insurance.

We could make a difference in the lives of many, many families with this user’s tax. Marshall Meadors is the candidate who understands this issue and will work to improve healthcare and public education in South Carolina. Vote Meadors for State Senate on Nov. 4.

Mary Ellen Hammond, Anderson

Comments

There are 2 responses to this article.

Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.

Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.

Click here for our user-contributions policy.

Comments

IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.

Before you post, consider this:

  1. Keep it clean. Comments containing obscene, profane, vulgar, lewd or sexually-oriented language -- including creative spelling and typographical representations of foul language -- will be removed.
  2. Be truthful. Don't lie or spread rumors about anyone or anything. Stick to discussing what is factually known.
  3. Be nice. Don't threaten anyone, and do not post any comments that involve racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person. Hateful or offensive comments will not be tolerated.
  4. Police yourselves. Hit the "Suggest Removal" button to alert us to objectionable comments. Do not respond to trolls or those who seek to harass another poster.
  5. Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  6. Help us get it right. If you have information to add to the story or you find a factual error or misspelling send us an email or call the newsroom at 864-260-1274.

Please read our official user-contributions policy.

Smoking-related Medicaid costs amount to $12.9 billion per year (University of California) study.

These are people on medicaid who smoke.

Another tax increase on the poor and uneducated
isn't going to help besides it's a dying tax base
when it's gone then what do they do to maintain Medicaid's ever increasing demand for money?

Implement more new taxes
Maybe on alcohol or obesity or on the air we breath? Where and when is it going to stop.


in response to freebird22

Do you smoke?
Know anyone who does?
Know anyone who would quit smoking because a pack cost 50 cents more?

See any young people smoking?

Don't worry. Thanks to simple biological cravings (and, maybe, millions of dollars of tobacco industry advertising and government lobbying?), the tax base is as secure as any other.

Fifty cents. It would bring the SC a little bit closer to the national average. It would still be considerably less expensive for one to wreck their health here in SC.
And with the extra funding, the state would be better able to provide for the smoker's health care later.




Post a comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

  Want the editors to know how you feel? Click here to say it privately.

Please download the latest version of Adobe Flash Player, or enable JavaScript for your browser to view the video player.