Home › Columns › News Columns
McCain’s revival means a hand-to-hand presidential contest
STORY TOOLS
Share and Enjoy
More News Columns
- It’s not impossible to imagine what happens even in Hart County
- Use the SMART method to reach your goals for 2009
- Why wait 'til spring? Now is the time to tackle 'winter cleaning'
Rate this Article
ANDERSON COUNTY The date of the Nov.4 general election was misstated in the original version of this story. It has been corrected
It looks as though we have a true presidential contest on our hands: Two gladiators at the top of their game who will fight hard and honorably for a cause greater than themselves.
At the culmination of the Republican National Convention, one thing was crystal clear: Mac is back, and stronger than ever.
For those with good memories, John McCain was the rock star of the 2000 campaign.
A rebel with a cause, he drew media buzz and unprecedented numbers of (young) voters, many crossing party lines — just as Barack Obama has in 2008.
Despite stumbling, for the most part, through his 2008 campaign, McCain’s choice of sassy spitfire Sarah Palin fully reclaimed that edgy, dangerous rock star mantle. Can you imagine how much free publicity McCain will get from a veep who could literally double as Tina Fey on Saturday Night Live?
It also says a lot that a 72-year-old torture survivor didn’t care that voters might question whether this woman — whipcrackingly funny, stunningly attractive but basically unknown and untested — should be a heartbeat away from the presidency.
I’m sure he smiled at the prospect of eroding the Democrats advantage with youth and women. And in cornering the professionally paranoid and “liberal” media — unable to give her a pass but defenseless against sexism charges should they “go after” after this fantastically popular lady.
McCain’s convention speech, too, was classic McCain: populist and pugnacious, with only minimum pandering to a party base that has never liked him.
He returned to the authentic themes that have marked his life and career: hatred of special interests; a desire to reform Washington, a willingness to uphold and defend America’s standing in the world and a determination to do all of these things without caring excessively about whom he offends.
Most importantly, he emphasized, as only he could, this election season’s winning message: a commitment to fight for the ordinary middle-class voter who is suffering through the worst economic times since the 1970s.
The word “fighter” was used 25 times. “Change” was used 10 times.
Taken together, McCain’s veep choice and speech took the battle to Obama’s turf — further proof that McCain’s military experience will serve him well.
The race is now celebrated hero versus heroic celebrity. Change versus change. Anti-Washington versus anti-Washington. A ticket of youth and experience versus a ticket of youth and experience. And both sides’ presidential and vice presidential candidates are carrying and embodying a hopeful, inspiring message to a fearful nation that America’s best days are still ahead.
The best line of McCain’s speech was his last: “We’re Americans, and we never give up. We never quit. We never hide from history. We make history.”
No matter what happens come Nov. 4, any American who steps into a voting both will do just that. And whatever the outcome, it’s clear this country will have enjoyed the most exhilarating and momentous presidential election in a generation.
Want to grill The Cocklebur? Join him for a live chat online Wednesday at noon. Can’t make it? Submit your questions in advance by visiting www.independentmial.com/chat/upcoming.
Comments
There are 8 responses to this article.
Comments are meant to offer our readers a forum for thoughtful, robust debate about local issues.
Comments are moderated, but you may find the content of the conversations offensive, objectionable or factually disputable.


IndependentMail.com does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before you post, consider this:
Please read our official user-contributions policy.
Good, balanced article Nick.
"The race is now celebrated hero versus heroic celebrity. Change versus change. Anti-Washington versus anti-Washington. A ticket of youth and experience versus a ticket of youth and experience. And both sides’ presidential and vice presidential candidates are carrying and embodying a hopeful, inspiring message to a fearful nation that America’s best days are still ahead."
I totally agree with quy here. The above paragraph pulled from your column is probably the best summary I've read anywhere of the race to come.
Up until now, it's been about what's best for the PARTY. Now we get to debate what's best for the COUNTRY, as it should always be.
It should be an eye-opening two months between now and November 7.
Where is the person that said AIM was liberally biased when Nick discussed Obama and the Democratic Convention just a few days ago? He said something about hoping Grady's was not advertising as he was boycotting.
I don't see any bias in either of Nick's articles. It always seems strange to me how people insult and mouth off to others online when they certainly wouldn't do it face-to-face.
Election day is November 4
Shhhh! Hoyer, I'm trying to trick a few Democrats. ;)
In a future op-ed piece; maybe someone will explain how electing as president a senator who has voted for Bush policies at a 90% rate for the last eight years constitutes "change"?
Besides, even if the 90-percent figure were true (which it's not), it's still more likely that a Senator who votes 90 percent of the time with Bush (who has no vote in Congress, by the way) could bring about change than could a Senator who votes 100 percent of the time with the Harry Reid/Nancy Pelosi liberal bloc that controls both Houses of Congress.
The Obama campaign likes to say 95%. I thought I was being a little generous!
Looking around for non-partisan resources (which is becoming increasingly difficult these days without subscribing to Congression Quarterly, what with the tons of internet blather out there), I was unable to find anything suggesting Sen. McCain has voted the Bush/Republican line less than half the time. Figures in the 70% range were the most common, and then only in the years 2000-2004. The last four years, numbers actually seem to move into the 90's, percentage-wise; which I read as a conscious decision to be more "Republican" in order to secure an eventual nomination.
(Requires free registration.)